>>3451273uh, okay, just checked the matter rapidly in wikipedia.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IdealismMaterialism is matter-over-mind and Idealism is mind-over-matter. I knew about this dichotomy since long ago, I just never bothered to check what was the exact words for the latter and considered an exclusively religious thing.
But you're really being dishonest if you're trying to imply most atheism in the modern world isn't based on the materialistic model. In fact, a quick CTRL+F in the article above gave me just one result for "atheism". Idealist atheism is clearly a very fringe point of view you took out your ass for the mere sake of disagreeing when my point was largely correct. You are nitpicking in the most exaggerate manner.
I'd go as far as claiming idealism is an exclusively religious point of view, and that idealist atheists claim to be so just on the grounds of a very shaky and disagreeable definition of God.
All in all thanks for leading me there but I can't see how that point of yours really adds anything to the discussion of proves me wrong in any way. You just wanted a cheap excuse to call me a retard.
