>>3586669Nah that's okay he has a point.
The goal of not having to work stays, but I'll crunch some numbers and tweak the method. I hadn't considered the diminishing returns. As to the 5 years not being enough, my point was that I would work with investing while i saved the money. Meaning I'm not expecting to live off of a lump sum; rather, having multiple streams of revenue, not just investing. Don't wanna sound like some sort of prick but I've also been working on a fantasy book. Nothing spectacular, but money is money. I'm finishing off the first draft. Even if just 1 person buys it a month that's money in my pocket.
The 5 years would essentially be me living frugally and preparing the machine. Is it long enough? I was sure that it was, but I could be wrong.
Thanks though. Better I get told off than to try and fail.
