>>3597212atheism does not imply you know for a fact there is no god.
it simply means you do not believe in one.
>>3597274>atheists on the other hand will argue that there is no even slightest possibility of existence of godhaven't heard or read much of that. we atheists do often like to point out that the person making an outrageous claim without any evidence to substantiate that claim is the one with the burden of proof. for example if I tell you I have a literal fire-breathing dragon living in my garage, I wouldn't expect you to just take my word for it. Yet when believers claim their invisible superdaddy exists, and are asked to provide evidence, it's a lot of "well you can't prove he doesn't!" which is not how the burden of proof works. you make the claim, you have to back it up.
