>>3738948I could make a joke about the hypocrisy of anons and judging shit but it's already been beaten to death.
A smaller board isn't necessarily good and neither is a large board necessarily bad, I think /bant/ lies in the sweet spot where it's active enough that content gets cycled through but it isn't so fast that threads start getting deleted within minutes.
>>3738968Technically, they are just as likely to be a dumbass. It is just that there are more users and therefore more individual idiots.
>>3739017"The internet is serious business", we repeated the jokes till the world and we ourselves began believing it. Can we say that 4chan's biggest target was eventually itself?
