>>3771590>It's not character assassinationYes it is. Her character is totally irrelevant to her arguments, her use, or the work she's doing. Find any of the most famous authors, politicians, anyone you like and you'll find they had character flaws, you didn't agree with some of their views, or they did something in the past. But it's completely irrelvant to the influence they had or their owkr.
Regardless, it doesn't belong on /pol/. If you want to talk about the political subjects she's addressing, it belongs here. If you want to talk about what did years ago or whether she;s a real blonde, that's not politics.
This thread has nothing to do with politics.
>Southern admitted to having a sexual relationship with black guysNo she didn't. Shills kept spamming that one picture of some half-black guy at a convention. They were floating around for months. Nobody knows if they fucked, and either way, it was years ago when she was a teen, and wasn't involved in politics or a nationalist. Everyone has done stupid shit as a kid. 90% of the people critcizing these "e-celebs" for not passing arbitrary purity tests would also fail them if their entire life was scrutinized and they weren't hiding behind annoymity.
And that's the defition of character assasination.
>everyone is talking about it.It was briefly talked about during that hitjob, now no one cares.
"everyone" = shills & MGTOW autists trying to character assassinate any anti-leftist, pro-white figure while she's in the process of making a documentary about the white genocide in South Africa
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TcNtdHOPfMMThrow yourself out of a helicopter shill faggot
