>>3829269It is really obvious when you look at the combined archaeological record we have. Those pyramids were built by cultures that
A interacted with each other
B interacted with the same global influence
And were much more advanced than we are told. What would be left of the US after 1000's of years? Almost nothing it would all disintegrate even the slabs and basements.
My personal thought is they are from an ancient lost civilization that was global, regionally distinct, but shared core beliefs. They all share advanced knowledge of astronomy, some of which we were not able to replicate until we had good telescopes and advanced mathematics. The argument that primitives built similar pyramids all around the world is farcical. The fact that almost nothing but stone monuments, some of which have evidence of aging far beyond the accepted timeline shows me they were built long ago and the traces of those populations were almost entirely lost. The stone age supposedly lasted 3.4 million years. So humans of one kind have been around at least that long according to modern science. I have yet to see any compelling evidence that there couldn't have been a more advanced hominid during this time. The fact that modern science and archeology refuses to investigate evidence that contradicts their preconceived notions fits right in line with the dogmatic acceptance of "established" theories.
