>>3869668I don’t need to, as I already have all of the evidence I need.
For my first piece of evidence, let’s take a look at
>>3869263. From this picture, we can see that she takes pictures with a Samsung phone. This means that the file name for the pictures will be a random combination of letters and numbers, implying she is phoneposting. However, from the various pics we have seen from this person, they don’t follow distinct pattern at all. Some have only 3 characters in their file name, others have
many more. There’s even a pic that has a watermark. I don’t know about you, but I don’t think that a picture taken with a phone doesn’t have a watermark. Therefore, I can conclude from the following evidence that you aren’t who you claim and are, in fact, a massive fag.
