>>3895359> if the person is weak and strikes you then striking back wouldn't be warrantedThat gives more rights to the "weak", and automatically reverses the tables instantly, and infinitely. By this logic, If one person, regardless of the gender, is drinking a beer in a bar, and an weaker person comes and slaps him in the face, the strong guy has no right to do the exact same thing. That is not justice. That is just reversing the power scale.
>the thing which levels the playing ground between the weak and the strong is a gun or weapon. if this is involved then everything i just said gets thrown out the window.So you're not against violence, but against violence with someone stronger than you. That is cowardice.
And a piece of advice. Except this initial comment
>>3895262which was not part of the argument, but a random post, I have debated you with facts and arguments. Not once have I called you a chink or other racial slurs. When you do that, and when you do it in every single one of your posts, it makes you look like you don't have enough arguments to give.
>Yes that is true but you're greek so there.I'm not implying that it's what you're saying or thinking, but it really doesn't help your case if half of your arguments are based on a meaningless and irrelevant with the conversation fact.
