>>3909191My uncle owns a 440 Challenger and it literally gets 6 MPG city (2.55 km per liter), parts outside the US are 3 times more expensive. You don't want one unless you are rich, and then when you do, you won't want to drive it in order to preserve it. Cuda 440s are even rarer and more expensive than Challengers from that era.
I have a Dodge 413 (6.7L V8, made in 1964) and stock it has 195HP and 385ft lbs torque with a 2-barrel carb and gets 8 MPG city. I was saving it to do a 440 top end swap and refurbish the bottom end and drop it in a small block Challenger and turn into a 400HP 600ft lbs torque prostreet build, but that fell through kind of, still have the engine though. I also have a Chevy 350 with 330HP in a truck, and a Ford 351W in a Ranchero (this one is actually my brothers).
My dream car would be 5th or 6th gen Camaro with a 6.2L and a 6-speed manual, good HP and torque, good fuel efficiency, plenty of parts (mass produced), cheaper than a Challenger or a built Mustang. Though I do still like both Challengers and Mustangs as well, certain ones.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=waj7ECbYZfkhttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CG6bugxdorM 
