I dont believe the story of the origin of our people is right, about the start of our civilizations, and the age of our species. When you just look at how much (((they))) lie about what was 70 years ago (WW2), how much do they lie about things that are 100 years ago? 500 years? 2 millenia? 10 millenia? a million years? or 100 million?

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/1416662-200-million-year-old-stone-bears-words-chinese-communist-party-collapses/
>In June 2002, a 270 million-year-old “hidden words stone” was discovered in Guizhou, China. A crack that formed 500 years ago in a large stone revealed six clearly discernible Chinese characters; the characters represent “The Chinese Communist Party Collapses [Zhong Guo Gong Chan Dang Wang].”

http://www.theepochtimes.com/n3/704738-2-8-billion-year-old-spheres-found-in-south-africa-how-were-they-made/

There are fossilized footprints of humans that are 290 million years old
https://www.ancient-code.com/this-290-million-year-old-human-footprint-has-experts-baffled/

Pic related, allegedly they overlayered 2 different symbols with parts of the rock breaking away.
https://raincool.blogspot.com/2010/05/helicopter-hieroglyphs-explained.html?m=1
But non of the writings mentioned here
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sethos_I.
https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ramses_II.
show their names like they supposedly were according to the (((debunk))) accuratly

Furthermore the egyptians (or who ever actually build the pyramids) were absolutely precise about everything in their monuments, probably wouldnt just make such poor work. Im not buying it. So I wonder is it depicting the past or the future?

TL;DR: Humans have been around a lot earlier than we are told and were a lot more advanced than previously thought