>>4031912> because /bant/ mostly serves as a board for banterHuh? Your opinion is inconsistent with
>>4031218While, alright. I understood your opinion, you think it has too much influence, but this is not true. Don't worry. It just borrow a place only for one thread. If you worry about /bant/, you must kill chirno threads as American have been trying. And you must participate killing threads from /pol/, this is also being done by anons.
However, requisition of the thread is ID, not /bant/ itself, so they'll turn to upright if /int/ got IDs. This is the best solution for the thread and you, but this will never happen. So, if people want to get ID with flags, people must move to boards where they are. This is not prohibited and you can't stop.
