>>4146101I know, I'm sorry for singling you out, but I'm just so fucking sick and tired of the implying implications style of drivel that is usually associated with /pol/lacks posting their garbage infographics one after another with zero context. Just for once I wanted to press on and actually have someone fucking explain what's going on instead of hopping from one shitpost to the next.
You can have 100% accuracy. Statistics is 100% accurate. It's the derived conclusions that people unrelated to the study commonly do that are inaccurate, not the statistics themselves. And if your presented conclusion needs additional explanations to make sense, then those additional explanations can and should be backed up with additional data as well, not just handwaving. That's why the overarching conclusions by Flynn are drivel.
I'm not sure why you're asking me about IQ and ethnicities. First off, you were initially talking about IQ and countries, which is different. Secondly, I don't "believe" anything. I believe my eyes, that's it. Civilized society rates higher on IQ tests constructed by civilized society. People are in disagreement what the cause is. Most people refute both 100% genetics and 100% environmental causes. The conclusions of most papers seem to trend more towards a majority of environmental causes. As of yet biological research hasn't found a genetic link towards intelligence. These are not things I "believe" in, these are things I'm reading literally off these pages. I'm not sure what you're asking me to tell you honestly
