>>4158831Sounds like a good game.
>>4158895The adverts are just a symptom of the problem. But with all the money behind ads it is definitely fueling the fire.
>lawsUp until recently there were also regulations in place to keep the net neutral.
Those no longer exist in the US which is exactly where most of this stuff is being pushed.
As for the implication that it might not be real, we already know for a fact that the government has worldwide surveillance networks using these types of algorithms on literally everyone.
That's one of the major things Snowden leaked.
Their main problem so far has been that they don't have enough processing power and data storage capabilities to collect everything, but you can bet your ass they want to and are working day and night to make it happen. That's literally the prime goal for any intelligence agency.
There's a reason they keep expanding with ever sizable data centers.
Xkeystroke could only backlog through what was necessary to keep the program running (something like a couple of days or so, aside from the obvious stuff which people give up willingly all over the place like social media profiles, posts all of which is correlated with credit card histories, medical histories, search criteria, passport usage, call logs (which with voice recognition is now at the point where you can include automated transcripts), as well as direct access to cell phones and computers.
Upon placing a tap on an individual they would be able to log pretty much everything constantly.
Even if they don't share that with others (they do which was also proven in the leaks), and never had a security breach (proven by the fact that the leak happened at all), why would you imagine that corporations which stand to make substantial profits on this type of thing would be above using methods like that for their own benefit?
Privacy is already dead, all we can do is obfuscate and make things more difficult for them.
If nothing else, keep informed.
