>>4237128and at that notorious z.i.p. succeeds with merely a couple points invested in the fraudulent stat, now I'd say, though through my words previously such may seem absurd to an extent - but a couple points is a well made investements, you could always find yourself, as successful as you are - on the verge. last resorts are welcome as long as they are not used beyond their capabilities. notorious z.i.p. perfectly utilizes the "special" stat as a least-in-priority last resort.
now as for the rest, let us beforehand take a look brunt the terrible, my second in choice of the warriors, brunt would be of great success in his battles though I imagine at most will fall short to the notorious by overall success in most matches.
brunt is strong and well built, and perhaps well more made at the the sort I shall mention now, more than the others and yet - he falls short to z.i.p. when we speak of stability.
just run the scenarios through your mind, what will happen once brunt NEEDS that extra defense, what will happen once he has missed an aid kit to another opponent by but a few zeptometers? brunt will then, as tragically so, regret his enormous strength. "O, I have killed dozens of brave hearts, one by one. O lord, how hast thou forsaken me to the vile hands of stability against an army?!" his final words would be unsoothing to any who witnesses, to say the least.
notorious z.i.p. is a true, compromised apprach to rise victorious upon an army of such unique figures, each to their own.
(2/3 oops)
