>>4383673Fuck, man. I've been typing a bunch of different things and then deleting it all again because it's literally impossible to keep it short and to the point.
I mean on one hand you can work on a case by case basis, if someone is being disruptive in society on a small scale, you question it from every angle. Who is he? What kind of person is he? What are his motives for doing this shit? Is there a fault inherent in the person or is there a fault inherent in the rules he broke, or both?
On the other hand you can also look at a larger scale. If someone manages to manipulate large pieces of society, economy, or even an entire country, then it's pretty safe to say that the fault doesn't entirely lie within the person, but there is fault within the society itself for allowing him to get this far. And then you tend to ask similar questions. Which flaws in society were taken advantage of? What's the cause of these flaws? Can they be patched in the short term and then also fixed in a better way in the long term?
This is like extremely abstract, it's pretty hard to make much sense of this without having an example or writing an entire book honestly. But in my very personal opinion, the driving forces behind a healthy society (apart from the very basics like food/drink/healthcare/love/entertainment/...) are a strong, unbiased, comprehensive education system that includes as many as possible. And secondly, matter how bad our generation currently has it, the least we should always strive for is to make sure the next generation has it a little better.
That's the best I can come up with atm desu
