>>4394553*they're certainly more advanced than YOU at least
>>4395208I think you're taking a look at it from too much of a commercial standpoint, but I hear you
>>4395437I think that's not a bad way of looking at it, but I'm not sure it's entirely right either
I think that almost every answer people put up will be reasonable in some regard. I think though that there is one main thing that it could be (you're totally allowed to shut me down like I did you guys, by the way)
Evolution is just establishing mutations and sussing whether they work or not. Technically, in a completely natural or wild world, they gays would die out. BUT, in our modern westernised world, there is an excess of children. Here comes in the idea of
>>4395437 that they are in some way child minders. Whether intentionally or by accident, this mutation to the human sexuality has opened up the possibility for families to grow again, without increasing the population and having a detrimental effect on, primarily, our own race due to overpopulation
Sound alright or nah?
