>>4396693Your entire point about cats being from Africa is asinine and off topic, I'll continue to ignore it.
>My assertions is that killing for meat is either done for fun (hunting) or pleasure (food). Not nutrition, not survival.That's where you are genuinely wrong. People kill animals for food, to eat them; making it survival even if they don't hunt it. Eating a salad isn't survival, but you still need to eat. Hunting is a traditional sport and killed beasts are usually brought back to be butchered unless the population need to be quelled
> So if someone kills an animal without eating it, they should be able to justify it as "for fun" or because it made them feel good.That's a crime and is not -nor will it ever be- justifiable. You can't go and torch someone property when nobody is at home because burning shit makes you feel good. There's a reason why it makes people angry and horrified; gratuitous, casual violence displayed so arrogantly make people mad and angry.
A pig getting butchered in broad daylight would be met with similar consternation, why are you so adamant in projecting a sociopathic ideology of pets murdering?