>>4500195It's the same syndrome that exists on /pol/ where a collective few hold a distorted idea of the mannerisms of the average board user, and at the slightest suspicion of an affront to their "board culture" (this doesn't exist), they become unironic and defensive, like
>>4500203and
>>4500212 here, investing themselves in an anonymous imageboard whose threads disappear after several hours.
When you're here long enough you know these types, the second-stage newfags, are the ones that destroy boards, just like they destroyed /b/, /v/, and /pol/.
Slap them all on the wrist, then ignore.
