>>4510805Burden of proofs is on the accuser.
Prove I'm a pedo IRL. You can't, all you have is text on a screen and some discord invite. None of which necessarily represents the IRL person. For all you know, I could be completely different IRL, and all this is just an alter ego.
But again, nothing I say matters because you lot are out for blood and you're absolutely convinced of my guilt.
>>4510831>Of course there is no proof, just you said he said.Exactly. And there is no proof to be found.
>>4510840> I'm raising valid suspicions of someone who has decided to namefag, tripfag, and act like an obnoxious faggot on 4chan.And I commend you on your initiative, but you're assuming I namefag/tripfag all over 4chan instead of just this board.
>We wouldn't be in this position if you weren't those three things.The risk was mine to take.
>We only can make assumptions from we've observed, and what I saw was an under-aged poster getting into DMs with a 20 something year old who had been hitting on him.Which again, is not conclusive proof in of itself. More he said stuff. If the feds were concerned, they would've already investigated - which would then bring us to "have they?" with no proofs on either side, so let's avoid that particular line of conversation.
At least hear my side: Yes, I did act like a predator to someone *claiming* to be underage (with no proofs), but only to shitpost (ironic shitposting is still shitposting)
I got into DMs with another *claimed* underage poster (again no proofs), and found from his DMs that he's experienced with ERP - so unless 14-yr olds are suddenly experienced in ERP, he's been lying about his age to troll you lot. I haven't talked to him since then, and I've given Reginald the cold shoulder since then.
Which leaves us with this: shall we continue shouting at each other, raising accusations at me with no solid proofs behind those accusations, or shall we leave each other alone and hope for the best?
Your choice.
