>>4524961water being wet would imply that there was a point where water was not wet, and with wet being defined as being covered in water, it's fair to say there was not a point where water was not wet, however, with it unable to be not wet, can we really call it wet? that would imply it is possible to remove the wetness, which is just crazy talk. so no, water is not wet, it has ascended beyond such concepts.
