>>4595587yeah, well, they sure are. but i vehemenenenmemently disagree with your approach of just ignoring them.
but i figure you're my best chance of having a civilized talk with a person who's on the "ignore them and they'll go away" side of the fence. cause outside of this thread, on the rest of 4chin it's impossible. so i'm gonna go for it.
why, in your opinion, are these things happening in america and the uk and the west?
is it because they're not ignoring the sjws and other elements hard enough?
and if you believe that, doesn't that mean that, according to you, the people who are opposed to this social justice agenda, are equally to blame? cause you seem to advise inaction. and since they took actions against them, that caused policies like those two i linked to become reality. and in that case, it's their fault too.
so, from my understanding of your approach, if someone says "i want to hire people based on their race" and another guy tells them "no, stfu retard, hiring based on race is wrong" and then the company ends up hiring based on race, the guy who was vocally opposed is the guy who made it possible and so is equally at fault.
is that right?
