>>4705680both
drawing an effeminate male character isn't necessarily gay or fetish bait in itself, it's only that if they're doing something gay. "trap porn" implies gayness 99.9% of the time. the 0.01% is if they're engaged in sexual acts with a female character.
>>4705688there is nothing pornographic about nudity as long as the character(s) aren't fucking, masturbating, behaving lewdly, showing signs of arousal etc. there's also the matter of making sure the art style doesn't lend itself to exaggerating proportions / focusing on sexual traits. some featureless art can be more pornographic than the art with parts drawn, simply because of the artist making the breasts and buttocks massive.
if it does't do any of that then it isn't porn. you will know when something is unequivocally porn.
i don't think this drawing is very pornographic. some may disagree, but it isn't porn from an objective standpoint. i don't know the intentions of the artist, or how someone in the furry fandom views it, but it doesn't set of any signal in my head that says "porn".
tl:dr draw the line at anything hardcore
