>>4730690The fact that frogposting has died after the banwave on the spam a few days ago has pretty much confirmed my assumption that it was a handful of autists deliberately shitposting on /bant/. In fact, if you look at /qa/, you'll notice that the frog count there was reduced as well as a result from the frogs that got banned here (not that those ungrateful bastards would ever acknowledge that) They'll probably resume once the three days are up, but until then it's smooth sailing.
It reminds me of that time /r9k/ did a tally to record all the frogposting occurring sitewide and /bant/ was one of the boards that ran negative. I think this occurred during June.
