/bant/ - International/Random

[12 / 5 / ?]

159KiB, 1067x905, fedoras 1.jpg

Anonymous ID:5whh3bK/ Mon 15 May 2017 03:24:31 No.474060 View View Reply Original Report

Quoted By: >>474085 >>474095 >>474115 >>474203

Proof of Old Testament stories

Sodom and Gomorrah destroyed
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=DBSIs2bHi5g

Noah’s Ark
https://youtu.be/xFpvKKmTF7c

Moses parting the Red Sea
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=d90NM9tgDQE

Mount Sinai and surrounding areas
https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=18gvJwx8VyI

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:Ixouw9Rz Mon 15 May 2017 03:26:13 No.474085 Report

Quoted By:

>>474060

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO 2.jpg, 241KiB, 900x1283

Anonymous ID:bqhtvJNR Mon 15 May 2017 03:26:27 No.474095 Report

Quoted By: >>474138

>>474060
why do you spam christ chan so much?
you're trying to promote the comics?

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image.jpg, 139KiB, 640x625

Anonymous ID:oFa5bC1e Mon 15 May 2017 03:27:57 No.474115 Report

Quoted By:

>>474060

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO image.jpg, 88KiB, 283x1600

Anonymous ID:oFa5bC1e Mon 15 May 2017 03:29:09 No.474138 Report

Quoted By:

>>474095
pic realted is the only comic one ive seen

Anonymous

View Same Google ImgOps iqdb SauceNAO Stack chap 4.jpg, 2MiB, 3808x4000

Anonymous ID:bqhtvJNR Mon 15 May 2017 03:31:44 No.474193 Report

Quoted By:

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:5whh3bK/ Mon 15 May 2017 03:32:18 No.474203 Report

Quoted By: >>474251

>>474060
http://i.imgur.com/0R8QNE3.png

16 minute video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WRB16BARvz0

Links in pic
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EZKocFGQf24
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hp8AF7i9A3U
http://www.newgeology.us/Shroud.pdf
http://www.sindone.info/DILAZZA3.pdf
http://www.shroud.it/ROGERS-3.pdf
http://shroud.com/pdfs/whanger.pdf
http://www.shroud.com/pdfs/accett2.pdf
http://shroudnm.com/docs/2013-01-10-Yannick-Cl%C3%A9ment-Reflections-on-Ray-Rogers-Shroud-Work.pdf
http://shroud.typepad.com/topics/2005/10/secular_peerrev.html
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blood_type_distribution_by_country
http://www.shroud.com/pdfs/ssi08part5.pdf
https://shroud.com/pdfs/orvieto.pdf
http://theshroudofturin.blogspot.ca/2016/08/medieval-photography-nicholas-allen.html
http://www.shroud.com/pdfs/soonsrepsonse.pdf

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:5whh3bK/ Mon 15 May 2017 03:34:33 No.474251 Report

Quoted By: >>474257

>>474203
New experiments date the Shroud of Turin to the 1st century AD. They comprise three tests; two chemical and one mechanical. The chemical tests were done with Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) and Raman spectroscopy, examining the relationship between age and a spectral property of ancient flax textiles. The mechanical test measured several micro mechanical characteristics of flax fibers, such as tensile strength. The results were compared to similar tests on samples of cloth from between 3250 BC and 2000 AD whose dates are accurately known.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:5whh3bK/ Mon 15 May 2017 03:34:50 No.474257 Report

Quoted By: >>474261

>>474251
FTIR identifies chemical bonds in a molecule by producing an infrared absorption spectrum. The spectraproduce a profile of the sample, a distinctive molecular fingerprint that can be used to identify itscomponents. Raman Spectroscopy uses the light scattered off of a sample as opposed to the light absorbed by a sample. It is a very sensitive method of identifying specific chemicals. The tests on fibers from the Shroud of Turin produced the following dates: FTIR = 300 BC ±400 years; Raman spectroscopy = 200 BC ±500 years; and multi-parametric mechanical = 400 AD ±400 years. All the dates have a 95% certainty.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:5whh3bK/ Mon 15 May 2017 03:35:07 No.474261 Report

Quoted By: >>474268

>>474257
The average of all three dates is 33 BC ±250 years (the collective uncertainty is less than the individual test uncertainties). The average date is compatible with the historic date of Jesus’ death on the cross in 30 AD and is far older than the medieval dates obtained with the flawed Carbon 14 sample in 1988. The range of uncertainty for each test is high because the number of sample cloths used for comparison was low; 8 for FTIR, 11 for Raman, and 12 for the mechanical test. The scientists note that future calibrations based on a greater number of samples and coupled with ad hoc cleaning procedures could significantly improve its accuracy, though it is not easy to find ancient samples adequate for the test.” They used tiny fibers extracted from the Shroud by microanalyst Giovanni Riggi di Numana, who gave them to Fanti. Riggi passed away in 2008, but he had been involved in the intensive scientific examination of the Shroud of Turin by the STURP group in 1978, and on April 21, 1988 was the man who cut from the Shroud the thin 7 x 1 cm sliver of linen that was used for carbon dating.

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:5whh3bK/ Mon 15 May 2017 03:35:24 No.474268 Report

Quoted By: >>474282

>>474261
These tests were carried out in University of Padua laboratories by professors from various Italian universities, led by Giulio Fanti, Italian professor of mechanical and thermal measurement at the University of Padua’s engineering faculty. He co-authored reports of the findings in 1) a paper in the journal Vibrational Spectroscopy, July 2013, “Non-destructive dating of ancient flax textiles by means of vibrational spectroscopy” by Giulio Fanti, Pietro Baraldi, Roberto Basso, and Anna Tinti, Volume 67, pages 61-70; 2) a paper titled “A new cyclic-loads machine for the measurement of micro-mechanical properties of single flax fibers coming from the Turin Shroud” by Giulio Fantiand Pierandrea Malfi for the XXI AIMETA (Italian Association of Theoretical and Applied Mechanics) congress in 2013, and 3) the 2013 book “Il Mistero della Sindone” (The Mystery of the Shroud), written by Giulio Fanti and Saverio Gaeta in Italian

Anonymous

Anonymous ID:5whh3bK/ Mon 15 May 2017 03:35:57 No.474282 Report

Quoted By:

>>474268
I think one of the most interesting things about the Shroud of Turin is that scientists cannot determine what made the original image on the shroud. The closest thing they can compare it to is like what happened in Hiroshima when the bomb went off and someone was vaporized into the ground. A very strange comparison but that's how it was described. There's also the less talked about Sudarium of Oviedo which dates back at least to the 6th century where it was found in Jerusalem, and all the markings on it match up with the thorn wounds and blood stains found on the Shroud of Turin's head rendering. Other proofs would include pollen found on both the shroud and the sudarium that would only be found in Ancient Jerusalem, the fact that the pose of the body actually represents a man sitting up rather than lying down (you can tell based off the knees), and so much more to indicate this truly is Christ's burial shroud.

Capcode	All Only User Posts Only Verified Posts Only Moderator Posts Only Manager Posts Only Admin Posts Only Developer Posts Only Founder Posts
Show Posts	All Only With Images Only Without Images Only Spoiler Images Only Non-Spoiler Images
Deleted Posts	All Only Deleted Posts Only Non-Deleted Posts
Ghost Posts	All Only Ghost Posts Only Non-Ghost Posts
Post Type	All Only Sticky Threads Only Opening Posts Only Reply Posts
Results	All Grouped By Threads
Order	Latest Posts First Oldest Posts First

On these archives

Your latest searches