>>4745447Absolutely this, and as I commented earlier, modern science is allowing homosexual females to have babies through artificial insemination.
Nature was doing just fine in keeping those numbers down but now we have a bunch of fucking dykes having kids growing up with 2 mommies and their degenerate, mutated homosexual DNA coursing through their veins.
I guess you win some and lose some. Liberals championed the procedure of abortion and that has all but weeded out Downs Syndrome. There used to be tons of those happy huggers running around.
However, I think soon we'll be able to screen for homosexual propensity as well. Once we do, the very procedure liberals championed will be the demise of the group they championed as their poster people. No one but the most stubborn, staunch subversive liberal would willingly give birth to a homosexual. No one wishes that on their children. No matter how much they try, it won't be accepted by the majority of people and that is basically a shot in the foot right out of the gate. Plus women these days are callus enough that they'd get an abortion if they heard the baby is gonna have one ear smaller than the other. Liberal logic is self destructive. You can't be 100% on everything all the time. You can't claim to be for a woman's right to choose and also for the right of a fetus to not be aborted because the reason is for something you dislike. That's why in front of a screen they will say they would never abort a homosexual child but behind closed doors the problem would take care of itself.
That's why I hope I live to see the day it happens, that we can screen for homosexuality and reverse the perverted, abhorrent behavior of letting a homosexual woman impregnate herself and raise a child with two mothers.
