>>4779833I'm probably wrong, willing to accept that. I'm a fucking clown for sure, I'm sorry HH.
But the fact someone spammed Podesta with an e-mail about aliens, which he didn't respond to or it would've been included.....like for that to be worth inclusion to you in even the most massive bulk-linking of evidence, sort of speaks to your general judgment. I'm not trying to be an asshole (anymore, was before) but I mean come on, that one proves nothing.
And idk shit about coding, but I know linking misleading URL's is very possible if you do know much at all.
Also, the one I was talking about looking photoshopped, I misspoke. Was actually a cia site pdf, and I really stand by it looking photoshopped, but could well be them shopping. Or could well just be my intense skeptic delusions warping my brain into mush from cognitive dissonance at even starting to try and accept what you're throwing down.
It's probably the latter, either way I was wrong to blast you off the cuff like that, I'm sorry man.
Not shill, not glowman, just a buzzed and sleepy manchild idiot who thought a couple years was lurking enough but needs to lurk a lot more and prob should exclusively lurk.
Truce perhaps? I'm done regardless and will look at all your links because I admit you roasted me into ash.
