>>4799872>you literally said religion is just a social construct and God only exist in our minds.Yes, and? Regardless if there is a creator-- we don't honestly know--, that doesn't make the belief in one with attached archetypes and philosophies invalid in its use.
>but there are such things as scientific principles that will exist for everything in our universe regardless of how we experiment it.Everything we know is human-constructed. Even our sciences and mathematics are created out of our of human perception and hasn't always been correct as a result. There isn't anything wrong with discovering things of the universe. You just don't appear to grasp the idea that even if something is empirically correct, it just as easily can be believed to be incorrect. It's the same reason somebody can be convinced 2 + 2 = 5. It's basic memetics.
You'd also have to believe in the broken idea of linear-progress to hold some belief that any of that knowledge is practically useful for the regular person in their day-to-day. A man can be born and die having lived a productive life not knowing about atoms or the Earth being round. It's not that this information has no use, not at all, but that it is by-and-large unneeded for the vast populace to know any of it to have a functional society.
Really, it's you that's looking for something deeper in trying to escape human metanarrative through science.
