>>4864019yes
i don't know the artist's intentions but i personally don't see the nudity as an inherently perverse thing. with the way it's drawn, it doesn't set off any sensor in my head that says "this was made exclusively for someone to jerk off to"
i figure since they're largely animalistic they don't really need or require clothing. most have fur, some have differently shaped legs, some have tails that might get in the way etc.
it adds diversity in character design when some have outfits and others don't. people look nasty without clothes unless you're horny so they can't do that
