>>4898301>I was talking about FinlandEver since the Finnish civil war and the defeat of the Finnish communists, the fascist nationalists were in power in Finland and they were allied with Nazi Germany. If the Soviets had not annexed Karelia, the Germans would've moved through Finland and attack Leningrad from front and back, thus leading to the USSR's downfall.
Had the communists won the Finnish civil war, this would not have been a problem.
>serving the state and the eradication of the individualFarmers produce food to feed people, the hell are you on about? It has never been about the individual, it has been about the greater good for society, and collectivization helped the Soviet people be better-fed than even us Americans.
>Khmer Rogueliterally CIA funded and backed, they even fought against Ho Chi Minh's Vietnamese revolutionary army, but at least they lost.
>Lenin survivedSure, why not? He and Stalin were great.
>TrotskyOh. Oh no. You ate up the liberal propaganda.
Trotsky has been too hot-headed and stubborn to lead the Bolsheviks. Had he gotten power instead of Stalin, he would've rushed the country into war with Nazi Germany instead of thinking critically and accelerating industrialization, and he would've hopelessly lost and Churchill would've been laughing his fat ass off.
Stalin led the USSR to survive the biggest menace to exist on this Earth while still coming out prosperous. Like I said, Kruschev was the one that signaled the beginning of the end for the USSR, and it's all because he was obsessed with corn and blew a load of the budget on a crop that will not grow in cold russian weather.
