>>4931658Alright numb nuts, I'm gonna level with you on something regarding the Compressed File Extension known as Joint Photographs Experts Group or JPEG (.jpg) and Portable Network Graphic, or PNG (.png)
JPEGs are compressed and are very good for images like
>>4931076>>4931012>>4929382Because they do not have contiguous sections of like colors. The compression saves bandwidth. That's what Compression is for.
Moving to PNG. PNG is lossless. It is amazing for images like mine. A lot of contiguous cells of the same color. Notice the size of this image but it is still less than 1 MB.
Now, the loss of data integrity is baaaad. Universally it is baaaad. You don't want to lose ANYTHING when it comes to file transfers. However... if you save a JPEG as a JPEG... guess what? It gets compressed again. Compressing something that was compressed? Guess what? You are losing data and quality.
JPEG is a legacy file extension that was useful back in "your days" when 100 Megabit Internet was fucking expensive and T1 lines required loans.
The Future is now, old man.
