>>5053005I know exactly what your were focusing on because you posted a picture illustrating your point, damage control faggot. Then you went further trying to justify it by saying it indicates genetic health.
>No, it's not the only thing. That's not how genes and epigenetics work. Habit does inform actual biology on a deep level.No one's talking about this shit faggot. For that matter,
>Attractiveness is linked to physical and genetic health. Actually no. This is only true to very basic extent, then it's no longer an indicator of either. Then it's just personal preference.
>There's a reason we find things attractive. >Trying to imply that attractiveness is subjective.Yes you're definitely an establishment faggot shill. Such shills love pushing an authoritarian model of attentiveness. So very gay. And yes it's subjective dumbass shill faggot, what you may find attentiveness, someone else may not. What things you may find more or less attractive, someone else may find less or more attractive, respectively. That is by definition subjective. Faggot.
