>>5246628>>5246611>>172789321Ah, I've seen your bookcase posted before on a /pol/ lit thread. I've always appreciated your collection.
>>172789705>reading Ayn RandJust because someone reads a book, doesn't mean they fully identify with its message. If you only read books to stroke your ego, you're doing it wrong.
>unironically buying those disgusting, tacky, kitsch Barnes and Noble """leatherbound""" classicsThey're okay. They're made with quality, but they can look either good or tacky, it really just depends on which other books you have on your shelf. The B&N books can either blend in in the best way or stand out in the worst.
He doesn't seem to have the B&N books that are bright blue or bright purple with a bunch of ridiculous pictures etched onto them, so it seems fine.
He did do good on the Folio Society and Easton Press though, for sure.
