>>5317037>PersiansNo. Persians are cool and have a great culture dating millenia ago, but the definition of white cannot include them, they are hella different, not in a negative sense.
>AzerisLol literal mutts, they are a turkic-persian-armenian-kurdish-etc mix
>GeorgiansI'd say yes. Their ethnicity originally formed as a mix of Caucasus and Anatolian tribes, as the DNA analysis shows; also one of the first Christian nations.
>ChechensYes, but not culturally since they are Sunni. But their ethnicity is also indigenous to the Caucasus.
>ArmeniansRather yes than no. I am Armenian myself, so I may be biased (even though I don't see anything bad in not being categorized as white), but here's what I think:
Pros:
>ethnicity formed millenia ago from the Caucasus tribes and Armenian Highlands natives and the DNA analysis shows they are 85% autochthonous, meaning little admixture with invaders and migrants>R1b is the dominant haplogroup>have historically had great ties with the Western civilizations via Romans, Greeks, etc., had a big influence in Byzantium (a whole dynasty of Armenian emperors), generally a lot of Hellenism in the culture>first Christian nation, fought in the Crusades being an ally of France>assimilate in white countries relatively quicklyCons:
>while generally dark haired and pale, some can look like literal sandniggers>a lot of Persian influence that affected the culture (such as carpet weaving and other oriental stuff) 
