>>5571137>It's not about downloading stuff but about upload anywaysThe thing is, what exactly constitutes `uploading'? When you send a HTTP request to a server you are uploading data; how the server interprets this, and what it decides to do with this is entirely up to the server. It just so happens that HTTP is standardised, so most interpret it in the way the standard intends, because it makes things easier; but that doesn't mean the server HAS to do this.
>They don't care what it will destroy I think ISPs do, since the onus would be on them to enforce this tripe, it would cost them huge amounts to employ the manpower and storage space enforcing this would require.
And the reason politicians don't care is because they don't understand just how terrible of an idea this is.
Politicians are retarded but think they know everything, that's how they come up with crap like this, despite people who actually know what they're talking about telling them it's dogshit.
>>5571165That's Article 11, which was also passed. 13 says any media uploaded must be checked against a database of copyrighted works and taken down if it is found to be breaching copyright.
