>>5711464the flaw in Dawkin's premise is that he is defining "gods" as just what men have claimed them to be. By definition, a "god" is devine beyond the limits of mankind. That rules out just about every written religion that claims to be the "word of god".
I believe that there MAY be a divine being or beings that created everything or nothing. I believe that it would be practically impossible for man to ever prove or disprove the existence of such a being or beings. I do not believe in any man-made religious doctrine. To me, this is the logical stance on the subject.
