>>5906768>been jealous of somebody else?Youre defending jealousy?
>There are guidelines printed in holy texts that are no longer relevant and any reasonable person sees thatYeah, including popes and prominent members of the christian clergy.
Trying to argue that christianity is totalitarian is just an indefensible position because all you have to base yourself on is doctrine which might have been current 2000 years ago but which has been entirely dropped. Islam, on the other hand, has not undergone such reformation and, if it should (which it wont because it cant) then, maybe, you might make sense but, as it stands, youre so obviously wrong I cant believe im replying to you.
> But as long as nobody's trying to force anything on anyone else, what's the problem?You dont understand Islam. Islam wants to conquer the world and it says so explicitly in their texts.
>The problem is extremists, not muslims.The two overlap to such an extent that id rather not suffer the former to accommodate the latter.
What obligation do I have to muhammad? Why should I take the risk, even if its 0.1%, of him being an extremist? So he can have a better life? Fuck that - I want a better life and I want my children to have a better life. Abdul can fuck a goat for all I care.
