>>6055410I only know of him what highshool has taught me: He was a man trying to gain control by putting a frame of reference. He was thrown into this world in a vessel of flesh. The absurdity of it all, made him want to put some order in his garden as to not go completely insane. He wanted to create order, where there was none before. I've never gotten around to Nietzche, because I didn't study past high shool, but I got a few whiffs. He seems more Rock and Roll to me. There was one quote from Nietzche where he said he could only discuss with Freud up until a certain point, because Freud's horizons were not big enough and Freud was an intellectual dwarf. Which was probably banter.
So here goes: I've always wondered whether it would be better to specialize and try to explain the world from therein, or whether it would be better to have had a taste of everything, allowing me to explain the world from a bigger perspective.
I think both reach the same conclusion. But I still don't know which one I want to be, and the clock is ticking.
