>>608984>>608984>Well this could be interpreted as feeling good is the meaning of life tho so it doesn't really align with the life has no meaning argumentI knew you were going to say that, but not really. It's not a meaning... it's a preference, it's an inference we project onto this concept rather than an intrinsic attribute of life.
'Meaning' implies that life was invented with a reason, a purpose in mind. Instead we imbue it with meaning like we do any letter, or a brand logo.
>Again this won't work with life has no meaning since feeling shit=wasting the life would feeling good=fulfilling life which in turn gives life a meaningyeah but like I said, it's not the same for anybody which veers away from any objective, universal, singular notion of a "meaning of life" which would give everything a clear cut objective in a teleology.
>>Both of what? What dichotomy is there?>Was referring to the doing nothing and having accomplishmentsAhh well, I don't think that dichotomy is there, like I said, there are certain behaviors we know generally lead to people not "feeling shit" but they are patterns, not universal, and there is certainly no purposeful reason for them in a holistic, cosmological sense.
of course my notion is an inherently western probs millenial one wherein the Godcrafted geocentric cosmology was replaced with the heliocentric cosmology, and then the point-of-the-big-bang astrophysical paradigm which on a different plane puts man, and the individual at the center of the conceptual/experiential universe even if they are floating far off from the center of the physical universe
