>>6389696>insultingrather pointing out what is most likely. And I assume you refer to the fact I said social interactions are guided by rules that, if broken, most likely infer some sort of autism. If it is indeed what you think, I'm afraid I will have to disagree on your implication for two reasons.
First off, it is clearly obvious that the social guidelines and rules that apply here differ greatly from those that govern the real world: it is socially expected to be off character, weird, insulting or plain old stupid here, because it is in the mood of the place. Just like it is socially acceptable to chug down two beers and dance wildly at a party with friends, but not at your workplace, it is acceptable to shitpost here, but not in real life.
Second off, breaking social norms is not in itself bad, because it relies greatly on the context of the interaction. What I was saying to +3P/SMCz is that the situations he describes do not allow boundary pushing, or off behavior from what is expected, because it is not the time nor the place. Other contexts may allow it, but in the situations he was describing, it is most likely not.
Otherwise, I really fail to see what you are referring to...
