>>6638343>Don't get all triggered.Then why did you green text my sentence anon? You're getting mad that calling something "cucked" and saying people are trying to make "safespaces" makes you look like an child parroting words to look cool?
>As they should have. The Irish and South Italians were more dysfunctional than other Europeans.Not surprised with that answer. Let me guess, only people of Nordic descent are the only "real" Europeans in your eyes
>He praises America's policies on the Races in his 2nd book. Yes, the "Zweites Buch" which was released in 1928, where he praises America's polices on racial segregation, the Immigration act of 1924, and forced sterilization of mentally retarded people. Yet again, I'm not surprised by your answer.
>And we all saw how the USSR was way nicer than the Germans after the war. Good job Roosevelt.Your sarcasm is unbecoming. When it's a war of extermination (Slavs where seen in the same light as Jews, nothing but vermin to destroy), I can't fault the way the Soviets dealt with the Germans. I can find fault in what they did to innocent people caught in the crossfire, and I can happily say that I don't support the actions of what the USSR did in the following years afterwards. However, if you believe the Third Reich would of been nicer then the USSR, then you're delusional.
>Hitler was willing to support the British Empire until it turned on his country.Because they're Germanic. He believed that all people of Germanic origin should stand together, even though the British see themselves as British. You seem to forget that Hilter had woefully little knowledge of the world outside of Germany, thinking that Britain would work with them (considering since the British have always made sure neither France or Germany were able to take over Europe in it's entirely) or the United States would be swayed into their thinking (even with all the policies Hitler admired, Americans still despise tyranny in all it's forms).
