>>6668913>There are multiple links and posts in this very thread that support the original claim and show the experiment is trash and that results were manipulated>other people saying things proves somethinginteresting. what were his claims. that the experiment was trash? pretty scientific criticism of a study that's been around for 50 years. results were manipulated cuz some lady said so 50 years later?
>You were pointed to them and haven't bothered reading or disputing any of the points yourselfnot true. you don't know what i've read retard. Also, im not going to read a book when my only question was what was wrong with the study. A simple sentence could have sufficed. The lack of a coherent concern but rather name calling and meming leads me to the only likely conclusion that he has no argument.
>You have no argument.no shit. he still hasn't even stated his fault with the study so how could i even have an argument if he doesn't even establish a position. Cmon, this is pretty grade school shit.
>Why? Because you are incapable of thinkingnice. you can answer your own questions. Maybe level 2 NPC will teach basic logic and conversation skills.
Keep trying Shlomo, one day you'll get it.