>>680677>companiesAnd what, pray tell, is to stop someone else from simply coming along and taking property from those companies by force (you know, the sort of thing that actually happens in Somalia)? A starving person gives zero fucks about your silly NAP.
And how is the tyranny of those companies any different from the tyranny of the state? Your previous image claimed that not acknowledging arbitrary private property systems was the same as ruling over someone, but enforcing those private property claims in the first place that sounds like ruling over others to me regardless of whether its a state or a company doing it.
>also you have to mix labour with soil to homesteadAccording to whom? Sounds completely arbitrary to me. And what if that field of land were already owned by someone who simply never used it? Would that piece of land just go to waste and be off-limits to everyone else just because some twat has a piece of paper saying he owns it?
>no one forces you to work in capitalismBasic biological needs force you to work or starve in capitalism. If all the land and industry is already owned then you're SOL and have no option but to work according to someone else's terms.
>they can delegate their rights to the monarch, voluntary servitude/slaveryOnce they're in the system they can't just say "you know what, I think I'm done with this whole monarchy business", and those who are born into the system aren't even given the initial option to surrender their freedom, they're fucked from the get-go.
