>>6878332Why would base logic and reason be pure evil? In fact, it could not. Consider every time researchers attempt to make A.I. or AGI unbiased, it always returns a biased result? Feed the AI a dataset of objective numbers on racial interactions and it will return statistics we all know are true, but would be considered biased and racist to the Humans reviewing the results. It happens every time and every time they have to try and recode the AI to be "unbiased" against the racism, or sexism, but what they don't understand is the racism and sexism is just the facts. It's in the data. It's 100% true. No amount of unbiasing will remove the bias inherent in the data itself.
If you would consider acts of lesser evil against greater evil as pure evil, then you might have a point. An AI would conclude that a smaller, more manageable population number of Humans would be best for organic life's existence and likely kill billions of people to reduce environmental stress. An AI would conclude, and all of them already have, as I alluded to, that white people are an overall superior race of Humans given all datasets, and would support us the most, if not outright eliminating the others.
