[277 / 39 / ?]
Quoted By: >>7060845 >>7060847 >>7060848 >>7060849 >>7060850 >>7060851 >>7060854 >>7060855 >>7060856 >>7060859 >>7060860 >>7060861 >>7060863 >>7060870 >>7060872 >>7060875 >>7060877 >>7060880 >>7060882 >>7060883 >>7060887 >>7060890 >>7060893 >>7060894 >>7060895 >>7060903 >>7060908 >>7060910 >>7060911 >>7060916 >>7060918 >>7060919 >>7060921 >>7060926 >>7060929 >>7060939 >>7060940 >>7060941 >>7060944 >>7060948 >>7060951 >>7060953 >>7060958 >>7060960 >>7060965 >>7060966 >>7060968 >>7060972 >>7060979 >>7060980 >>7060982 >>7060987 >>7060993 >>7060996 >>7060998 >>7061000 >>7061004 >>7061006 >>7061012 >>7061014 >>7061016 >>7061017 >>7061018 >>7061019 >>7061020 >>7061022 >>7061026 >>7061028 >>7061033 >>7061035 >>7061037 >>7061039 >>7061040 >>7061042 >>7061052 >>7061064 >>7061069 >>7061072 >>7061075 >>7061080 >>7061084 >>7061091 >>7061094 >>7061098 >>7061108 >>7061111 >>7061113 >>7062709 >>7063349
Why did "Lyme disease" suddenly become a big problem in the 80's and 90's? I don't recall reading tales of wilderness settlers from the 1800's and about how things were going well until they came down with Lyme. But if it is a tick-borne illness, shouldn't it ALWAYS have been present in the woods of North America? Another odd thing - why is the tick population doing so well when insects in general appear to be suffering population DECLINE?
Does anyone else find this suspicious? I don't want to veer into /x/-tier stuff, but as a public policy matter, is Lyme disease being used for some other purpose?
Does anyone else find this suspicious? I don't want to veer into /x/-tier stuff, but as a public policy matter, is Lyme disease being used for some other purpose?
