>>7068714>but the other part of the claim is that there are actually two types of gravitational forcesthere's likely a whole heck of a lot more, but sure
>is that the stable isotope of 115 that can only be created in zeroGsounds a lot like certain types of "exotic matter". As for the whole zeroG thing, that's an absolute load, as you'd have to go to some place like the Boötes void to get anywhere close to that, given how gravity functions.
Hell, even then that would be bullshit given things like the Great Attractor and Dark Flow.
Rather, you would need some sort of field to effectively cancel out gravity, similar to what's being done with that experimental magnet complex in florida
https://invidio.us/watch?v=h89IrTvceqcpoint being, anyone saying something "can only be made in muh zeroG" is full of shit.
Like how Juipter doesn't orbit around the sun, due to its mass, but rather the sun, it, and everything else in the solar system orbit around a common point of gravity between their respective masses.
>The saucer then rapes the 115 in order to make that field extend even more freudian slip? lol
>Supposedly, Lazar used his stolen 115 in a vacuum chamber to show a small group of people including George Knapp space-time getting bentconsidering there are plenty of other ways to do that in the lab these days (such as those magnetic wormholes that everyone loves to forget about that made quite a bit of stir in the medical communtiy last year)
Or, you know the Pound–Rebka experiment in 1959
This shit is nothing new, or amazing, and it baffles me that people latch onto it so.
>due to either Lazar making things up from the start or simply not knowing the truth about the material.My money's on that if he's trying to push this zeroG crap. I'm sure the truth lies somewhere in the middle as always, but this sounds an awful lot to be claiming with very little evidence to back it up.
