>>719982It's only an ad-hominem if the insult is the argument, not if it accompanies it you nitwit.
And what do you mean with "excuses"? I just told you why you're wrong
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roman_military_personal_equipment>>719987>the other way around, it was mostly clinching and grappling,No.
And fuck your r*ddit spacing.
>and the effective weapons against clinching and grappling were not macesMcaes were effective against armour you retard, which prevented grappling.
You also fail to understand how many weren't that heavily armoured and how grouptactics in the military worked.
>but daggers that could fit between the different pieces of an armourLiterally talked about them in another post.
>and soldiers in an army didn't have to pay for their armours ffsAre you fucking retarded?
What armies are you talking about? Most medieval armies didn't have heavy armour as the standard equipment for their soldiers.
Goddamn redditspacing grapplecuck, I bet you like flails and other memeweapons.
