Notice how all these threads always say the same thing over and again. "No he was shit at perspective and bad at anatomy" as if suddenly pol got occupied by world renowned artists.
Number one, there aren't even people in this painting, so you can tell this is just the "learned" response for academic types. This is how they all behave, on autopilot. Everyone just "knows" Hitler was bad at perspective and anatomy, it's just a "fact" stupid, look at his art! What, are you so stupid that you can't identify bad perspective as well as the dean of a world class art school?
Classic case of the Amateur Expert, who in fear of being exposed as a fraud, pretends to be an expert on everything, and mistakes the things he's been told by other people as wisdom divined by his own Supreme Intellect. Academia appeals to these people because it lets the establishment implant their ideas into a willing population eager for an external validation of their intelligence. Anyone who's gone to an American university will know exactly what i'm talking about from first hand experience.
Hitler's experience with the liberal academic system was his first redpill. He observed the behavior mentioned above, and that lead him to see the Jewish influence behind the curtain, and we all know where that took off.
Sure, he's not the greatest painter in the world, but it's totally disingenuous to call him Bad. The Jewish academics hated his art because it was traditional and emphasized the land and the volk. The weimar art scene at the time was experimental and sexual, and they developed a philosophy that art was intended to CHALLENGE social norms rather than glorify them. This made sense to a certain extent, but it was because of this that Hitler realized how art had been turned into a weapon to keep his people suppressed under the weight of the rampant, state-supported degeneracy of the weimar republic
