>>7268742The sea people were a collection of people in the eastern Mediterranean. They went from Greek island to Greek island and often raided the coasts of Tukey, Italy, Greece, and all throughout the middle east they also settled there. They are extremely ancient aswell. Older than the Babylonians. There was a reason why I put the sea people before the Babylonians. Most of Europe will have descended from them and coasts of the eastern Mediterranean.
A palastinean is not defined by religion. Though the conflicts of modern Israel are motivated by this, among other things. All Jews would have descended from sea people. Palestinean nature is not inherently religious.
Due to the mass of Jewish immigration to Palestine in the 1920s to 1940s most aren't regarded as palastinean.
The arguement is if there should be a palastininean or Jewish state.
But the Jewish state has become more than that just a Jewish state. It is a bastion of democracy in the middle east. And it doesn't discriminate against palastineans by basis of race rather the concern of national security and terrorism because they want a state named palastine.
The only argument for Palestine is that the Israelites have occupied the palastinean territory disobeying the UN decision.
The only need for Palestine would be for the name. That's it. The national identity is quite weak. The Israelis have incorporated non-violent palastinean people because there is no need for extreme monitoring.
During the Clinton era a deal was almost achieved until radicals on both sides would commit acts of violence that would stop that.
If the movement had been non violent in the first place there probably would be a state of palastine. Now it is to late, sadly.
