>>7418290Because you're operating on the assumption that the universe isn't as (relatively)simple as it seems. It could be, it could not be, I don't align with either. I think it would be silly without any evidence for which there is none other than personal experience which isn't verifiable.
Let me refine the core idea.
There is exactly one absolute I am willing to argue for: There is no inherent meaning. The individual consciousness grants it to their reality.
There is no argument or evidence that could change this. Arrive at the perfect center of pure reality, and there is nothing except for you. Believe what you will, and I shall believe what I do, but nothing could convince me otherwise in regards to that.
To clarify further, I am not demanding you form your reality around my ideas. I just want to be understood without the twists and bends of interpretation from lack of detail.
>>7418290>choose what you sayI do, carefully. I don't just say whatever comes into my head. I'm just not good at casual conversation.
