>>758678It doesn't depend on your taste it depends on where it is. Someone does some big piece on some legal land then it's art, if they did the exact same piece on a platform (without permission) it's vandalism. Even wasteland would be classed as vandalism, but it's incredibly doubtful anyone would press charges depending on what surface you had painted on.
To goys though whether it's art or vandalism comes down to whether it's a piece (generally well painted) or if it's a tag/dub/throwie. Your general goy knows literally nothing about graffiti, but they're normally two types of people. Either your working class vandal or your middle class legalhead. You get both in each camp, but it's a rare crossover. The vandal to legal is normally if someone is too old and/or gets caught and severely punished. The opposite is when your middleclass "rebels" without actually hurting anyone and, if they do get caught, generally getting away with it because middle class.
Sometimes you'll get something like pic related (legal wall) and think perhaps they're redpilled. But then you find out they're a Bernout. Same person also calls out the bankers, but if you talk about who the bankers are then you're an anti-semite.
tl;dr working class are generally vandals, middle class want to be vandals, but are too scare, but they still need to rebel.
Also stencils aren't graffiti. Banksy isn't a graffiti artist.
